Abstract

This study evaluates whether repeated postoperative visits by the anesthesiologist improve patient ability to recall the anesthesiologist's name and the patient's perception of and satisfaction with anesthesia services. In a randomized, prospective trial, 144 patients with an anticipated postoperative length of stay of at least three days were enrolled in three groups: Group A patients (n = 48) had one postoperative visit, Group B (n = 48) had two postoperative visits, and Group C (n = 48) had three postoperative visits. All postoperative visits were performed by the attending anesthesiologist on consecutive postoperative days. Patients were contacted two days after their last postoperative visit to complete a study questionnaire. Patients were able to recall the anesthesiologist's name significantly less frequently than the surgeon's name, and there was no difference in name recall among groups. Recall was not affected by patient age, sex, or ASA physical status; the mode of contact (telephone versus personal visit); the anesthesiologist's gender; the presence of preoperative medication; or the identity of the preoperative evaluator. Patients could identify the anesthesiologist's gender approximately 85% of the time, regardless of group, and were more likely to identify female anesthesiologists (P = 0.026, odds ratio 3.3). Patient evaluation of hospital, surgical, and anesthesia care was favorable in all groups and did not vary with group. Increasing the number of postoperative visits does not improve patient name recognition of the anesthesiologist or increase patient satisfaction with or perception of anesthesia services.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.