The importance of suprasegmental features in language attitude research: evidence from a study of teachers’ attitudes towards Hong Kong English

Abstract

ABSTRACT Previous language attitude research has paid little attention to the (para)linguistic inventory of the speech samples used for accent evaluation. As an example, this study used five Hong Kong English (HKE) voices with more or less localised features, which were assessed by 100 English language teachers in Hong Kong in a verbal-guise experiment. In addition to the closed questions used in the verbal-guise study, we asked the listener judges, in open-ended questions, to reflect on their first-hand impressions of the speakers, their perceived likability, and what in particular they had noticed in the speakers’ language. Findings show that suprasegmental features are highlighted as important for speaker identification and evaluation, whereas segmental features are not mentioned. Listener judges mention prosody (intonation, pitch and stress) as particularly salient; nativeness and level of proficiency are also highlighted. Findings are discussed vis-à-vis language attitude research methodologies, and we argue that the study has contributed towards disentangling the language attitudes processes by emphasising the salience of suprasegmetals for accent recognition and evaluation. We conclude with a call to replicate the research in other socio-cultural contexts and to include other research methods.