Abstract

Phytoplankton production (PP) in wetlands is not measured as often as that of macrophytes. A three year-study during a period of sustained high flooding was undertaken in a central Spanish floodplain wetland (Las Tablas de Daimiel National Park) to determine net PP, its spatial heterogeneity and controlling factors, and compare it with primary production in macrophyte communities. This enabled us to estimate carbon budgets for each community. All PP variables showed high spatial and temporal variability among sites, resulting in low coherence even when flooding connected all sites. Net PP corresponded to 25- 36% of submerged plant production and 3-10% of helophyte production. Net PP was controlled by different size fractions of phytoplankton biomass at different wetland sites. Neither nutrients nor zooplankton affected net PP or productivity. A high spatiotemporal variability of PP in wetlands occurs arising from complex processes that affect the underwater light field. Carbon budgets of phytoplankton often exceeded those of submerged macrophytes and attained between 4 and 37% of helophyte budgets. Although usually considered to be marginal, our study shows that PP in the open water of wetlands should be taken into account for determining accurate wetland carbon budgets, mostly in periods of high flooding, which often result in changing the carbon budget of primary producers.

Highlights

  • The measurement of phytoplankton production (PP hereafter) has a long tradition in stagnant freshwater bodies (Manning & Juday, 1941; Talling, 1957; Rodhe, 1958)

  • We address the spatio-temporal variability of net Phytoplankton production (PP) and its controlling factors

  • A realistic approach to study PP in wetlands can be the use of Clark electrodes which allow for rapid determination of photosynthesis and parameters related to saturation irradiance, photoinhibition, and photosynthetic capacity (Harris, 1973)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The measurement of phytoplankton production (PP hereafter) has a long tradition in stagnant freshwater bodies (Manning & Juday, 1941; Talling, 1957; Rodhe, 1958). Few studies (Robarts & al., 1995; Robinson & al., 1997) have focused on shallow, clear-water wetlands, but studies in highly turbid wetlands, where high amounts of dissolved organic matter and/or particulate suspended matter can influence irradiance attenuation, and PP, are almost lacking. This is unfortunate because phytoplankton can play a major role in the carbon metabolism of some wetlands (Robinson & al., 1997; Sánchez-Carrillo & al., 2000), thereby influencing nutrient cycling. In efforts to make PP measurements cost effective, experiments in wetlands are usually limited to one sampling area (Robinson & al., 1997), thereby missing out much environmental variability of the process

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.