Abstract

Responses to microhabitat are often neglected when ecologists sample animal indicator groups. Microhabitats may be particularly influential in non-passive biodiversity sampling methods, such as baited traps or light traps, and for certain taxonomic groups which respond to fine scale environmental variation, such as insects. Here we test the effects of microhabitat on measures of species diversity, guild structure and biomass of dung beetles, a widely used ecological indicator taxon. We demonstrate that choice of trap placement influences dung beetle functional guild structure and species diversity. We found that locally measured environmental variables were unable to fully explain trap-based differences in species diversity metrics or microhabitat specialism of functional guilds. To compare the effects of habitat degradation on biodiversity across multiple sites, sampling protocols must be standardized and scale-relevant. Our work highlights the importance of considering microhabitat scale responses of indicator taxa and designing robust sampling protocols which account for variation in microhabitats during trap placement. We suggest that this can be achieved either through standardization of microhabitat or through better efforts to record relevant environmental variables that can be incorporated into analyses to account for microhabitat effects. This is especially important when rapidly assessing the consequences of human activity on biodiversity loss and associated ecosystem function and services.

Highlights

  • Understanding the spatiotemporal patterns in species distributions is critical for implementing conservation strategy [1]

  • The largest contributors towards dissimilarity between the microhabitat treatments where O. acuminatus, C. aequinoctialis, E. hamaticollis and C. incertus, which accounted for 48%, 23%, 9% and 8% of the total dissimilarity between treatments, respectively

  • We found obvious differences in abundance between the treatments for C. aequinoctialis (Wilcoxon signed rank test: W5851, Z522.3387, P50.02, r520.27) and O. acuminatus, (Wilcoxon signed rank test: W51843, Z52.462, p50.01, r50.28), but not for E. hamaticollis (Wilcoxon signed rank test: W5859, Z521.5897, P50.11, r520.18) or C. incertus (Wilcoxon signed rank test: W51145, Z50.007, P50.97, r5861024)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding the spatiotemporal patterns in species distributions is critical for implementing conservation strategy [1]. What can be inferred from the data that are available is wholly dependent on the scale at which they are collected and analyzed [4, 5] This means that effective conservation prioritization directly depends on the fidelity of methodologies used in biodiversity assessments. Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) are one such group, and are widely recognized as an effective taxon that can be used in biodiversity assessments across the world [8, 9]. They are a key component of many tropical and temperate ecosystems, play important roles in ecosystem functioning (such as nutrient cycling, secondary seed dispersal, and parasite control), are amenable to rapid sampling, and are complemented by an active group of taxonomists [8, 10, 11]. The response of dung beetles to environmental variables has been extensively documented [12,13,14,15,16,17], and they show marked responses to anthropogenic disturbance [9, 18, 19]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call