Abstract

We describe a Monte Carlo study examining the impact of assuming item isomorphism (i.e., equivalent construct meaning across levels of analysis) on conclusions about homology (i.e., equivalent structural relations across levels of analysis) under varying degrees of non-isomorphism in the context of ordinal indicator multilevel structural equation models (MSEMs). We focus on the condition where one or more loadings are higher on the between level than on the within level to show that while much past research on homology has ignored the issue of psychometric isomorphism, psychometric isomorphism is in fact critical to valid conclusions about homology. More specifically, when a measurement model with non-isomorphic items occupies an exogenous position in a multilevel structural model and the non-isomorphism of these items is not modeled, the within level exogenous latent variance is under-estimated leading to over-estimation of the within level structural coefficient, while the between level exogenous latent variance is overestimated leading to underestimation of the between structural coefficient. When a measurement model with non-isomorphic items occupies an endogenous position in a multilevel structural model and the non-isomorphism of these items is not modeled, the endogenous within level latent variance is under-estimated leading to under-estimation of the within level structural coefficient while the endogenous between level latent variance is over-estimated leading to over-estimation of the between level structural coefficient. The innovative aspect of this article is demonstrating that even minor violations of psychometric isomorphism render claims of homology untenable. We also show that posterior predictive p-values for ordinal indicator Bayesian MSEMs are insensitive to violations of isomorphism even when they lead to severely biased within and between level structural parameters. We highlight conditions where poor estimation of even correctly specified models rules out empirical examination of isomorphism and homology without taking precautions, for instance, larger Level-2 sample sizes, or using informative priors.

Highlights

  • Researchers in the social sciences deal with phenomena that are inherently multilevel

  • Van de Schoot et al (2015a) observed that variance parameters estimated with Bayesian methods can be subject to spikes especially for variance terms, which inflate parameter estimates. To examine whether this occurred in the current Monte Carlo study we checked trace plots for the within and between exogenous latent variance and latent residual variance parameters for a sample run from each of the 384 cells in the design

  • We needed to ensure that the correctly specified models were estimated accurately so that any error in the models for the misspecified condition could clearly be attributed to the ignored non-isomorphism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Researchers in the social sciences deal with phenomena that are inherently multilevel. In these research settings it is commonly the case that intrinsically micro level attributes of individuals are measured and that these measurements are aggregated for analysis to the meso (e.g., classrooms or teams) or macro levels (e.g., schools or firms). The newly formed higher-level constructs can be related to other variables that are aggregated or to variables that were measured directly at the higher level of aggregation. Such analyses are considered multilevel in nature. This article focuses on structural relations between constructs measured at some lower level of analysis, (i.e., a micro level, such as the individual) and aggregated to some higher (i.e., meso or macro) level. We use the terms meso and macro to represent any level of aggregation of interest that is higher than the level at which the construct was measured

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call