Abstract

Abstract Flow and buildup testing of gas wells in Alberta is common practice for the determination of reservoir pressure, permeability and wellbore skin. Post-frac welltesting is still regarded as the preferred welltesting method, due in part to current government regulations for initial testing requirements. With the maturing of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) in recent years, the development of unconventional gas reservoirs has significantly increased. Deep tight gas reservoirs have become an important part of unconventional gas resources and this paper will address several issues and pitfalls related to the welltesting of tight gas. Initial reservoir pressure is probably one of the most important ‘data points’ for reservoir engineering and completion design and yet one of the most abused and assumed parameters. Field examples will highlight major errors that are likely to occur when post-frac flow and buildup tests are analyzed for tight gas reservoirs without precise knowledge of the initial reservoir pressure. This paper will demonstrate that errors of reservoir pressure as small as 2% can lead to significant overestimates of the well 's recoverable reserves. Introduction The strong commodity prices in the energy sector experienced in recent years have resulted in an increased activity level for the development of unconventional tight gas reservoirs. Natural gas price is the major factor that will determine the economic viability of tight gas reservoirs. However, there are additional factors that should be taken into consideration, such as original-gas-in-place, completion efficiency, well spacing and the ultimate recoverable reserves. Unlike conventional gas reservoirs where proven reservoir engineering techniques are easily applied, the predictability of deep tight gas reservoirs is much more difficult to achieve. Too often the post-frac welltest results from wells completed in tight gas reservoirs are used to establish initial pressure, completion effectiveness and reservoir permeability for production forecasting for economic decisions. The flow behaviour of hydraulically fractured tight gas reservoirs is very complex and significant errors in the determination of matrix permeability and fracture parameters often occur. These errors can have a significant impact on predicting gas production and total cumulative gas recovery. Discussion With the maturing of the WCSB and high natural gas prices, the activity levels in the oil and gas industry have increased to record levels. So has an increased number of tight gas well completions. Generally speaking, performance evaluation of tight gas wells reveals a trend where the production performance of the wells is much less than what was initially predicted. These errors are considered the result of overestimating reservoir parameters such as the reservoir flow capacity (kh). Short references will be made to some of the factors determining the success of developing a tight gas resource:Original-gas-in-place (OGIP) is usually determined by the volumetric method and requires knowledge of reservoir pressure, mapping and petrophysical parameters. One equation used for estimating OGIP is:Equation (1) (Available In Full Paper)Hydraulic fracturing is a necessary step in the completion process in tight gas reservoirs in order to achieve commercial production.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.