Abstract

Motion analysis using inertial measurement units (IMU) has emerged as an alternative to optical motion capture. However, the validity and reliability of upper limb measurements varies significantly between studies. The objective of this study was to determine how sensor placement affects kinematic output in the assessment of motion of the arm, shoulder, and scapula. IMUs were placed proximally/distally on arms, and medially/laterally on the scapula, in a group of eleven healthy participants, while performing nine different motion tasks. Linear regressions and mixed models analysed how these different sensor placements affected the estimated joint motion by establishing the linear relationship between sensors placed on the same body segment.The placement of sensors affected the measured kinematic output considerably, most prominent affect was seen for sensor placement on scapula during flexion and abduction, and on forearm during pronation/supination. The slope of the linear regression lines was 2.5 during flexion, 2.7 during abduction, and 1.8 for forearm pronation/supination. The results of this study suggest that the forearm sensor should be placed on the dorsal side of the forearm, at the distal end; the upper arm sensor should be placed laterally, on the distal part of the arm; and the sensor on the scapula should be placed cranially, along the spine of scapula.

Highlights

  • Motion analysis has the potential to provide an objective, accurate and more detailed way to assess upper limb pathology

  • The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect on kinematic variables from distal and proximal sensor placements on arms, and from lateral and medial placements on the scapula, in a group of healthy individuals, while performing standardized arm movements included in the modified Mallet scale

  • The purpose of this study was to investigate the importance of Inertial measurement units (IMUs) sensor placement when performing upper limb tasks commonly used in the evaluation of individuals with OBPP

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Motion analysis has the potential to provide an objective, accurate and more detailed way to assess upper limb pathology. Optical skin-based marker systems are considered the gold standard for motion analysis, but they require the remittance of patients to a clinical movement laboratory [1]. Comparing sensor-based systems with optical systems, recent studies show promising results regarding validity [3] and inter-system agreement [4]. As recently reviewed, limited conclusions of the validity and reliability for upper limb motion can be made due to the small number of studies made for each joint [5]. The clinical use of IMUs is limited due to the lack of standardized and validated kinematic protocols [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call