Abstract

Understanding the deformation model appropriate for an oil or gas field in an overthrust belt has major consequences for the exploration and exploitation of these structures. Predicted reserves and well locations will be influenced by the model chosen. With Mississippian gas wells costing $1.2 to $1.5 mm each, a re-drill or even a whipstock to hit the target will negatively impact the bottom line. This is especially true if the reserves are 3Bcf as opposed to the 20Bcf originally predicted. For the purpose of this talk we will define two end-member deformation models: fault bend folds and detachment folds. The fundamental difference between the two models is that the fault bend fold has nearly equal amounts of displacement on both sides of the structure, whereas the detachment fold has the displacement absorbed by the fold. In the examples from British Columbia the reservoir formation is not directly imaged by seismic data. The top of it has to be [open quotes]ghosted in[close quotes] from the Permo/Penn event above it. If this is done using a constant thickness for the Permo/Penn to Mississippian interval this would be a more suitable technique for a fault bend fold model. As this area has amore » significant amount of detachment folding this technique is not appropriate. These differences in the deformation models will significantly impact both well location and reserve calculations.« less

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.