Abstract

AbstractMillions of dollars are spent annually to reduce nutrient loading to Chesapeake Bay, with a fundamental goal of reducing the extent and severity of low dissolved oxygen (hypoxia) during the summertime months^1^. Yet despite recent reductions in nutrient loading, large volumes of the Bay continue to be impacted by hypoxia and anoxia during the summer months^2-3^. One obstacle to assessing efforts to improve water quality in the Bay and other estuarine systems is a complete understanding of the physical processes that modulate dissolved oxygen and the long-term variability of these processes. Here I analyze a 58-year data set of estimated hypoxic volume in the Bay^2^ and demonstrate the importance that wind direction plays in controlling the extent and severity of summertime hypoxia. This analysis indicates that wind direction explains a greater percentage of the observed inter-annual variation in hypoxic volume than estimates of nutrient loading. The implication is that physical processes play a dominant role in modulating hypoxia and that much of the increased hypoxia observed since the early 1980s can be attributed to changes in wind forcing that are the result of decadal-scale climate variability. These findings emphasize the importance of understanding the physical processes that modulate dissolved oxygen in coastal and estuarine systems and highlight the potential impact that climate change may have on water quality in Chesapeake Bay and other estuarine systems.

Highlights

  • It is generally believed that anthropogenic nutrient loading has increased the frequency and severity of hypoxia in coastal waters[4,5]

  • I revisit the time-series of hypoxic volume in Chesapeake Bay initially presented by Hagy et al (2004), to evaluate the role that wind direction plays in contributing to the inter-annual variability

  • River discharge was calculated as the average daily value between January 1 and May 31 for each year recorded at the United States Geological Survey (USGS) gauging station on the Susquehanna River at Conowingo, Maryland

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is generally believed that anthropogenic nutrient loading has increased the frequency and severity of hypoxia in coastal waters[4,5]. Chesapeake Bay, estimates of nitrogen loading explain a relatively small portion of the variance in the observed hypoxic volume[2]. I revisit the time-series of hypoxic volume in Chesapeake Bay initially presented by Hagy et al (2004), to evaluate the role that wind direction plays in contributing to the inter-annual variability.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call