Abstract

Multi-stakeholder forums are considered an essential element of landscape approaches for sustainable development and integrated ecosystem management. Such forums are widely adopted in environmental management policies and introduced as precursors for novel institutional arrangements for collective action in complex landscapes. However, while they are often held up as a mechanism for greater inclusion and representation, they can also further marginalize less powerful stakeholders. In this respect, the importance of politics in shaping the success of a multi-stakeholder forum is often overlooked. This article examines different multi-stakeholder mechanisms for governing the Lake Malili Complex in Sulawesi, Indonesia —a landscape characterized by competing land use interests and the presence of threatened endemic species. The case highlights a successful bottom-up multi-stakeholder approach that became a model for collaboration, and which was subsequently scaled up to cover the broader Lake Malili Complex area.. The research is based on longstanding participation in the politics of decision-making processes at the Lake Malili Complex, complemented by in-depth examination of the establishment of the multi-stakeholder forum. The findings show that strong, locally-based initiatives provide an avenue for generating greater participation in achieving mutual goals for conserving the Lake Malili Complex. However, participation in the multi-stakeholder platform is not enough to push for decision making at the district level, where more powerful management decisions take place. We therefore note that outcomes of community-based resource management are limited when they are not backed by more political approaches to influence decision making

Highlights

  • Multi-stakeholder forums have long been introduced as an essential component of integrative landscape approaches for sustainable development and integrated ecosystem management, and have been adopted in various policies and institutional arrangements (Lee, 1994)

  • We gather the data from systematic reading of grey literature from three Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) projects on multistakeholder forums, including Wallacea, Univeritas Andi Djemma (UNANDA), and the Forum Pemerhati Kompleks Danau Malili (Forum for the Malili Lakes Complex, the Forum)

  • The top-down initiatives to implement integrative landscape approaches at the Complex reflected a continuation of business-as-usual, in which “government” bureaucratic means were prioritized over “governance” measures that various stakeholders held direct interests in addressing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Multi-stakeholder forums have long been introduced as an essential component of integrative landscape approaches for sustainable development and integrated ecosystem management, and have been adopted in various policies and institutional arrangements (Lee, 1994). The implementation of multi-stakeholder initiatives for integrative land uses are normally slow, create high transaction costs, often experience turbulence and can become dysfunctional over time, and may further marginalize weaker groups of participants (Garcia-Lopez, 2013; Kuster et al, 2018). In this respect the importance of politics is often overlooked.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call