Abstract
In this article, the author demonstrates how the reasoning of the Supreme Court of Canada in the case of Alta Energy Luxembourg (2021) could influence the interpretation and application of the OECD Principal Purpose Test, resulting in an outcome more consistent with the protection of the rights of taxpayers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
