Abstract
U.S. firms have the option to measure debt liabilities at fair value, which results in unrealized gains and losses from debt valuation adjustments (DVA) when a firm’s own credit risk changes. Critics raise concern on the counterintuitive net income consequence of DVA, namely, when a firm’s credit risk increases (i.e., bad news), debt values decrease and resulting DVA gains increase the firm’s net income (i.e., good news). Prior research posits that the perplexing net income effect of DVA is attributable to incomplete fair value accounting for contemporaneous assets such as unrecognized intangible assets (UIA). Specifically, DVA gains or losses are not properly offset by opposite fair value adjustments of UIA in net income. In this paper, we examine market valuation reactions to DVA gains and losses, conditioning on the level of UIA. We first develop a model to demonstrate the mitigating effect of UIA on the relation between equity returns and DVA. Using a sample of U.S. bank holding companies during 2007–2013, we show that while the association between equity returns and DVA is positive when the level of UIA is low, the association decreases and turns from positive to negative with increased levels of UIA. Our findings suggest that the market appears to understand the offsetting relation between DVA and changes in UIA fair values resulting from a firm’s own credit risk change.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.