Abstract

BackgroundThe Implementation Research Institute (IRI) provides two years of training in mental health implementation science for 10 new fellows each year. The IRI is supported by a National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R25 grant and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Fellows attend two annual week-long trainings at Washington University in St. Louis. Training is provided through a rigorous curriculum, local and national mentoring, a ‘learning site visit’ to a federally funded implementation research project, pilot research, and grant writing.MethodsThis paper describes the rationale, components, outcomes to date, and participant experiences with IRI.ResultsIRI outcomes include 31 newly trained implementation researchers, their new grant proposals, contributions to other national dissemination and implementation research training, and publications in implementation science authored by the Core Faculty and fellows. Former fellows have obtained independent research funding in implementation science and are beginning to serve as mentors for more junior investigators.ConclusionsBased on the number of implementation research grant proposals and papers produced by fellows to date, the IRI is proving successful in preparing new researchers who can inform the process of making evidence-based mental healthcare more available through real-world settings of care and who are advancing the field of implementation science.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe field has experienced what National Institute of Health’s (NIH) Dr David Chambers characterized as an ‘explosion’ in quality and quantity of implementation research [7]

  • The Implementation Research Institute (IRI) provides two years of training in mental health implementation science for 10 new fellows each year

  • We provide webinar training to all fellows to optimize their ability to learn from these visits

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The field has experienced what National Institute of Health’s (NIH) Dr David Chambers characterized as an ‘explosion’ in quality and quantity of implementation research [7]. This is demonstrated by ‘rigor and ambitiousness of ongoing studies,’ more comparative effectiveness studies of active [dissemination and implementation] strategies,’ and the ‘capacity building of multiple research centers and networks’ [7]. This paper focuses on the necessary complementary efforts to grow the implementation science workforce It describes the rationale, components, outcomes to date, and participant experiences with the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded Implementation Research Institute (IRI) in mental health at Washington University in St. Louis

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call