Abstract

This is the first of the two articles dealing with the implementation of the right to education in South Africa and Nigeria. The article examines the meaning and the process of implementation of the right to education as well as the general nature of states’ obligations under the international human rights instruments regarding the right to education. The article examines the measures put in place at the international level towards realizing the right to education. While this first article examines legislative measures, the follow-up article examines the non-legislative measures, that is, administrative measures as well as other measures put in place to ensure theimplementation of the right to education. The right to education is an empowerment right which is given wide recognition in a number of important international and regional human rights instruments as well as in national constitutions. The article argues that in terms of the international human rights instruments, states are obliged to make primary, secondary and higher levels of education available, accessible, acceptable and adaptable to all in their territories. It posits that by having ratified those international agreements in which the right to education is guaranteed, both South Africa and Nigeria assumed obligations under international law enjoining themto realize the right to education and to respect freedoms in education in their respective territories. It submits that, despite the international obligations and commitments to provide education for all, there is a significant gap between what is stipulated and the practical realities in the two countries.

Highlights

  • The right to education is a right which is given wide recognition in a number of important international and regional human rights instruments.[1]

  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), 1948, which is the watershed of all human rights instruments, provides for the right of everyone to education in the following terms: “[e]veryone has the right to education

  • That notwithstanding the provisions in both the South African and Nigerian Constitutions and other laws guaranteeing the right to education as considered above, there are still gaps between the laws in the statute-books and the practical realities being experienced by citizens of both countries

Read more

Summary

SUMMARY

It posits that by having ratified those international agreements in which the right to education is guaranteed, both South Africa and Nigeria assumed obligations under international law enjoining them to realize the right to education and to respect freedoms in education in their respective territories. Despite the international obligations and commitments to provide education for all, there is a significant gap between what is stipulated and the practical realities in the two countries

INTRODUCTION
24 Hutchison and Wiggan “Introduction
26 Govindjee “Lessons for South Africa Social Assistance Law From India
35 Hutchison and Wiggan “Introduction
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.