Abstract
The crime often committed is embezzlement, dishonesty by hiding other people's goods/assets by one or more people without the owner's permission to control or use it for other purposes. In Article 374 of the Criminal Code, the term embezzlement in the office can be said to be a crime of embezzlement with a weighting. The method used in this research is normative juridical research that examines or analyzes primary and secondary legal materials by understanding law as a set of rules or positive norms in the statutory system that regulates human life. Based on the research result, the application of material criminal law to cases of criminal embezzlement in the office is implemented based on legal facts, including the statements of witnesses, statements of the accused, letters, and the presence of evidence. Besides that, before the judge imposes a sentence, he needs to consider what can aggravate and mitigate the defendant to apply a sentence commensurate with the act and provide justice for the defendant and a deterrent effect against a decision.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
