Abstract
The formulation of problem in the implementation of inclusion in handling corruption case has reflected the legal objectives which are legal certainty, justice, and expediency, and inconsistency in implementing the inclusion in handling corruption case, the purpose of the research is To find out and analyze the application of inclusion in handling corruption case has reflected the legal purposes which are legal certainty, justice and expediency and To find out and analyze the inconsistency in applying of inclusion in handling of corruption case, using empirical research method which resulted that there is indication that the implementation of inclusion is not yet implemented which causing inconsistency of law enforcement officer, i.e., Police, Attorney in applying the article of inclusion in handling of case corruption and inconsistency in the application of inclusion in corruption cases causes the occurrence of discrimination in the process of law enforcement, so that does not reflect the legal purpose of legal certainty. It is recommended that to create legal objectives, law enforcement officers must be consistent in applying the articles of inclusion in the handling of corruption cases and to achieve legal certainty should investigators, and prosecutors apply the juridical participation in corruption cases. Keywords: Implementation, Inclusion, Corruption Case
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
