Abstract
While the pressure of legitimacy was found to greatly influence companies’ environmental reporting (ER) practices, being environmentally responsible however is not necessarily reflected through positive and descriptive environmental information. Unless companies begin to truly commit to upholding environmentally responsible, that is, to be accountable towards their business environmental impacts, the issue of incompleteness and incredibility of ER will remain topical. For companies to effectively measure and report their environmental performance, the implementation of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) is essential as conventional accounting systems disregard the generation of environmental information. Using social issue life cycle theory as an interpretive lens, this paper aims to propose a theoretical framework to investigate the relationship between the extent of EMA implementation and ER practices.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
