Abstract

Competency-based curricula require the development of novel simulation-based programs focused on the assessment of entrustable professional activities. The design and delivery of simulation-based programs are labor-intensive and expensive. Furthermore, they are often developed by individual programs and are rarely shared between institutions, resulting in duplicate efforts and the inefficient use of resources.The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing a previously developed simulation-based curriculum at a second institution. We sought to demonstrate comparable program-level outcomes between our two study sites.A multi-disciplinary, simulation-based, resuscitation skills training curriculum developed at Queen’s University was implemented at the University of Saskatchewan. Standardized simulation cases, assessment tools, and program evaluation instruments were used at both institutions.Across both sites, 87 first-year postgraduate medical trainees from 14 different residency programs participated in the course and the related research. A total of 226 simulated cases were completed in over 80 sessions. Program evaluation data demonstrated that the instructor experience and learner experience were consistent between sites. The average confidence score (on a 5-point scale) across sites for resuscitating acutely ill patients was 3.14 before the course and 4.23 (p < 0.001) after the course.We have described the successful implementation of a previously developed simulation-based resuscitation curriculum at a second institution. With the growing need for competency-based instructional methods and assessment tools, we believe that programs will benefit from standardizing and sharing simulation resources rather than developing curricula de novo.

Highlights

  • Postgraduate medical education programs in Canada and the United States are transitioning or have transitioned to competency-based medical education (CBME) models that incorporate national milestones and entrustable professional activities (EPAs) [1,2]

  • Simulation curricula are traditionally developed at the individual residency program level and are rarely shared within or between teaching institutions

  • A total of 87 first-year postgraduate medical trainees from 14 different training programs participated in the resuscitation curriculum and provided written consent for their assessment data to be used for research purposes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Postgraduate medical education programs in Canada and the United States are transitioning or have transitioned to competency-based medical education (CBME) models that incorporate national milestones and entrustable professional activities (EPAs) [1,2]. One of the challenges of implementing CBME is that it requires direct observation and demonstration of competence of stage-specific EPAs before progressing in training. Simulation can assist with these challenges by providing safe and reproducible experiences while allowing expert observation, focused feedback, and deliberate practice [5]. The development of simulation curricula requires considerable resources and many programs have a limited number of faculty with formal simulation training. Simulation curricula are traditionally developed at the individual residency program level and are rarely shared within or between teaching institutions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call