Abstract

In the 21st century, we observe an increasingly aware of a series of global, technological and scientific advancement that create a need of good performance in science education at all levels of schooling. These challenges, among them rapid science and technological changes, a rise of information technology use, and continuing movement towards a knowledge-based society all highlight the need for deep education in science including biology, chemistry, environmental science, physics, and sustainability. In fact, the impact of teacher characteristics of self-efficacy level is important for science education and students’ learning outcomes in science. In an effort to highlight this, this study investigated the impacts of teacher efficacy and motivation on students’ academic achievement in science education in secondary and high schools located in Iran and Russia using motivation for academic performance scale (α = 0.89) and teacher self-efficacy scale (α = 0.91) as measuring instruments and achievement test in science education. Two hypotheses were tested using the statistical programme. For evaluating the demographical differences of the students in terms of their academic achievement, comparative analyses were performed using t-test. Results showed that gender difference was not significant but nationality difference was significant in terms of students’ academic achievement in science education. Also other findings reported significant impact of teacher self-efficacy and motivation on academic achievement in science education. Implications, suggestions and recommendations for students, teachers, school administrators, parents, government, education counselors, etc. were discussed and presented.

Highlights

  • In the contemporary nations, there has been an increasing emphasis on industrial, scientific and technological advancements because of the obvious effects of science and technology on today’s world and the future

  • We find requisite to describe the concepts of teacher self-efficacy, motivation for learning science, and academic achievement of students conceptually and to provide knowledge for the relevant background theories comprising the context of this study

  • As a result of the examination on theoretical foundations, to elicit more comprehension for the individual differences and contextual factors in science-related achievement, we examined the relationship between these individual differences and contextual factor

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been an increasing emphasis on industrial, scientific and technological advancements because of the obvious effects of science and technology on today’s world and the future. Due to greater importance of science and technology, schools have been encouraging students to learn science related subjects. We suggest that scientific and technological advancement in a country can be initially achieved through the high performance of students in science education and the efforts of schools for establishing efficient science education. As mentioned by the studies of Tella (2007) and Ochonogor (2011), students’ performance in science classes in secondary and high school education was not found adequate and couldn’t improve in the last decade. Various background indices and a set of complex variables have been referred to impacting students’ achievement in science subjects in schools at all levels. The students’ performance and interest in science subjects have been related to several contextual, emotional and motivational factors, including volume of the subjects, workload, students’ task orientation and personal abilities, instructional design and materials for effective teaching, teacher’s efficacy and teaching skills, students’ motivation and personality, class size, etc. (Abbasi et al, 2018; Ale, 1989; Armstrong, 2009; Bietenbeck, 2011; Ehrenberg, Brewer, Gamoran, & Willms, 2001; Harris & Sass, 2008; Kirillova et al, 2017; Kwon, 2016; Odogwu, 1994; Ohuche, 1978; Rus, Radu & Vanvu, 2016; Say & Bag, 2017; Shcherbakov et al, 2017; Wang & Hsieh, 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call