The impacts of reducing atmospheric and oceanic de-aliasing model error on temporal gravity field model determination

Abstract

SUMMARYThe Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and its successor GRACE Follow-On mission have been estimating temporal gravity field models for various geoscience applications since 2002. While the errors in atmospheric and oceanic de-aliasing (AOD) model are still the key limitation for GRACE-type missions especially taking advantages of improved laser ranging interferometer (LRI), this paper explores the realistic assumption of continuously reducing AOD model error in global scale and regional scale (e.g. ocean, Greenland, Qinghai-Tibet plateau and South America) in the anticipated future. For this, using a realistic orbit scenario and error assumptions both for instrument and background model errors, the 5-yr full-scale simulations are implemented in the context of 26 scenarios with different AOD model errors. Our overall simulation results demonstrate that: (1) when the AOD model errors are reduced in the global scale, the corresponding gain in temporal gravity field determination is significant, with the cumulative geoid height error decrease from 11.28 to 6.25 mm in spectral domain, as well as 26.3–65.2 per cent noise reduction in terms of mean RMS residuals over ocean in spatial domain. (2) When the AOD model errors are reduced in the regional scale, the improvements of temporal gravity field estimations are diverse in different simulation scenarios. The most notable noise reduction, with 22.9–43.9 per cent noise reduction in spatial domain, is observed when the AOD model error decreases in ocean. The limited noise reductions (0.1 per cent and 1.3 per cent respectively in spectral and spatial domain) are observed in the temporal gravity field estimations if the AOD model is refined in other typical regions such as the Qinghai-Tibet plateau, the Greenland and the South America. (3) However, when the satellites passing over the AOD model refined regions, the along-orbit range rate analysis indicates that, there are visible differences by about 50.0 nm s−1 in terms of range rate residuals as well as 11.0–48.5 nm s−1 in terms of the mean RMS of range rate residuals. These results reflect the benefits of reducing AOD model error in both global and regional scale for improving GRACE-type temporal gravity estimation, especially considering the development of LRI technology.