Abstract

The impact of public policy on the mineral industries is difficult to measure due to little short-term responsiveness to policy changes by companies already investing in known fixed deposits. Nevertheless, early-stage (or grassroots) exploration has been suggested to provide early signals about the impact of a policy. Among mineral policies, taxation has received plenty of attention in theoretical analysis and simulation studies, but little empirical evaluation.Profit-based royalties should affect early-stage exploration by decreasing the expected value of a discovered deposit. The empirical approach here uses a difference-in-difference strategy, analyzing the Chilean mining royalty changes of 2004 and 2010. The first tax change is argued to be exogenous as it happened due to the political cycle and in line with a major increase in commodity prices, and the later modification occurred as a result of a major earthquake. Results indicate a surprisingly small average impact on grassroots exploration. However, the effect is heterogeneous as larger companies increased their budget as opposed to junior companies. The absence of geographical spillovers not only supports these estimated effects but also suggests that neighboring countries do not need to engage in harmful tax competition.

Highlights

  • Proper management of nonrenewable resources requires coping with a wide set of political and economic challenges

  • The absence of geographical spillovers supports these estimated effects and suggests that neighboring countries do not need to engage in harmful tax competition

  • Subsequent studies focus on the relative weights of investment climate and geological potential driving exploration decisions, indicating that both aspects and their interaction are relevant to the allocation of exploration expenditures (Jara, 2017; Khindanova, 2011, 2015)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Proper management of nonrenewable resources requires coping with a wide set of political and economic challenges. Subsequent studies focus on the relative weights of investment climate and geological potential driving exploration decisions, indicating that both aspects and their interaction are relevant to the allocation of exploration expenditures (Jara, 2017; Khindanova, 2011, 2015). These studies have been limited due to data availability, only analyzing cross-sectional country level data. They do not focus on the ability of exploration expenditures to provide early signs on the effects of changes to specific mineral policies

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call