Abstract
The renewed incidents of xenophobia, which engulfed South Africa, dented this country’s image, continentally and internationally. These occurrences invoke an unresolved question, thus: Can xenophobic attacks be attributed to tighter or discriminatory immigration policies or are people caught in quandary for socio-economic survival? Similarly to the pogroms in Poland against Jews, xenophobia left fatal scars, not only amongst Africans and non- Africans, and has affected the informal economy negatively. This article explores the impact of xenophobia on the operations of the informal economy on which the poor depend for socio-economic survival. For the most part of April-May 2015, the streets of Durban were deserted because of the xenophobic attacks on non-South African businesses, particularly those owned by Africans from different parts of the continent. Fear was planted in the city of Durban, which in turn led to the decline in economic activity, both formal and informal sectors, with the later bearing the most brunt. The city was turned into a battle field whereby Afro-hatred was perpetuated with the intention of causing bodily harm and making deportation threats. Nationals from other African countries, mainly Nigerians, Somalis, Malawians, Zimbabweans, Mozambicans, Ethiopians and Congolese were accused of taking jobs meant for locals and suffocating their businesses as well as taking their women. In fear of their lives, non-South Africans were forced to close their businesses and to go into hiding. This article argues that the impact of xenophobia is a double-edged sword and has far- reaching implications for both South Africans and non-South Africans as the local city dwellers depend on the services provided by informal businesses. The article uses both primary and secondary data. The empirical data was extracted mainly from the street traders and hawkers eking a living in the informal sector.
Highlights
Xenophobia has become a world-wide phenomenon that is orchestrated by various factors, mainly associated with social and economic conditions and circumstances, both locally and nationally
The scramble for scarce resources and job opportunities between South Africans and non-South Africans did fuel tensions but it led to xenophobia and xenophobic attacks aimed at causing bodily harm
The notion of xenophobia or Afrophobia and its impact on the operations of the informal economy was interrogated within the context of sustainable livelihood framework
Summary
Xenophobia has become a world-wide phenomenon that is orchestrated by various factors, mainly associated with social and economic conditions and circumstances, both locally and nationally. While most African nations attained their political freedom in the immediate post-1060s period, socio-economic development lagged behind with poverty, unemployment and inequalities on the rise These challenges are famously known as “evil triplets” or “social evils” (Terreblanche, 2012: 101). This was reasserted by Ramphele (2008: 21) who argues that many African countries, though politically free, continue to suffer from inadequate economic reforms to underpin sustainable socio-economic development. This gloomy situation is further aggravated by autocratic governance systems which are notorious for displacing African citizens through civil wars that dislocate nationals from their land-of-birth sources of livelihoods. In an attempt to present a racism perspective to South African xenophobia against African immigrants, Bekker (2010: 136), Mngxitama (2008: 195), Evert (2011: 7) and Matsinhe (2011: 298) describe the phenomenon as “negrophobia or Afrophobia”
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.