The impact of using ovarian-adnexal reporting data system magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) score on risk stratification of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses

Abstract

BackgroundAdnexal masses (AMs) are prevalent, leading to a substantial clinical effort including imaging for diagnosis, surgery, and pathology.Aim of the studyThe goal of this research was to evaluate the reliability of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) scale for diagnosing the sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses and to discriminate between malignant and benign ones using the O-RADS MRI scoring system.MethodsThis study included 72 cases with indeterminate adnexal masses in any age group. We excluded patients with previous history of operated adnexal lesion and patients who had contraindications for MRI as pacemakers or iron clips.ResultsBased on O-RADS MRI score, 44.4% of masses were diagnosed as O-RADS II indicating that they were almost certainly benign, 11.1% as O-RADS III indicating low risk malignancy, 8.3% as O-RADS IV indicating intermediate risk malignancy and 36.1% were diagnosed as O-RADS V indicating high risk malignancy. O-RADS MRI score for malignancy gave sensitivity of 92.31% (95%CI 63.97–99.81), specificity of 82.61% (95%CI 61.22–95.05), PPV of 75% (95%CI 54.84–88.11) and NPV of 95% (95%CI 74.12–99.21) with an overall accuracy of 86.11% (95%CI 70.50–95.33).ConclusionsThe O-RADS MRI score has excellent accuracy and validity in determining whether an AM is malignant or benign. Using this score in clinical practice may enable a tailored, patient-centered approach for masses that are sonographically indeterminate, avoiding unnecessary surgery, and in certain cases allows less extensive surgery, or even fertility preservation when appropriate.