Abstract

Introduction The cost of unrecognized bipolar disorders over time is unknown. Methods Ten years of data from the California Medicaid program were used to identify depressed patients initiating new episodes of antidepressant therapy and with 6+ years of post-treatment data. Recognized bipolar (RBP) patients received a BP diagnosis or used mood stabilizers in the pre-index period. Unrecognized bipolar (UBP) patients received an initial BP diagnosis or used a mood stabilizer in the post-index period. Depression-only (MDD) patients had no BP diagnosis or mood stabilizer use. Three analyses were conducted: (1) regression models of cost per year, (2) a regression model of aggregate cost over 6 years and (3) a time trend analysis of the costs for UBP patients. Results 14,809 patients were identified: RBP 14.5%, UBP 28.2% and MDD 57.3%. The growth in costs per month for UBP patients over 6 years (171%) far exceeds the growth for RBP and MDD patients (82% and 95%, respectively). RBP and MDD patients cost $2316 and $1681 less per year in the 6th year relative to UBP patients ( p < 0.0001 for both estimates). The cost per month increased by $91 for each month of delayed diagnosis ( p = 0.011). Costs for UBP patients increased by $10 per month prior to their initial BP diagnosis ( p < 0.001) and by − $1.01 thereafter ( p = 0.006 for the change in slope). Limitations Classification of patients based on diagnosis or mood stabilizer use using paid claims data is inexact. Conclusions Early diagnosis of bipolar disorders may significantly reduce health care cost.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.