Abstract

Abstract Background It is reported that in New Zealand financially disadvantaged adolescents are less likely to access orthodontic treatment than the more affluent in society. Objectives The aim of the study was to investigate the attitudes of a group of New Zealand orthodontists towards the current fee-for-service model of treatment funding. A second aim was to explore orthodontists’ perceptions of how the affordability of orthodontic treatment affects low socio-economic families. Methods As part of the project, 11 volunteer orthodontists were interviewed. A subsequent content analysis of the collected data was performed. Results Most participants reported that parents would feel inadequate if they were unable to secure orthodontic treatment for their child; however, some participants also indicated that it was common for parents to ‘go without’ to fund their child’s treatment. Most participants maintained that the government should only fund treatment for severely disabling malocclusions but not other treatments due to the limited health budget and orthodontic treatment being primarily considered for aesthetic reasons. Some participants reported that if the government funded orthodontic treatment, it would result in over subscription and compromised standards of care. Conclusion Despite some low socio-economic families being unable to access orthodontic treatment because of the expense, the current fee-for-service model may be the best method for delivering high standards of orthodontic care.

Highlights

  • The present study aimed to explore the perceptions of a group of New Zealand (NZ) orthodontists regarding the financial inability to access orthodontic treatment and its effects on low SES families

  • After the participants were asked if they thought a parent would feel upset if they could not secure orthodontic treatment for their child, participant 4 stated ‘I suppose it depends on the parent’ and participant 5 said ‘if they perceive it as a need, yes’

  • The present study provides a new perspective on SES and access to treatment by providing qualitative data focusing on the effects of an inability to access orthodontic care

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In New Zealand (NZ), orthodontic treatment is predominately supported on a fee-for-service basis, the government funds orthognathic surgery and orthodontic treatment for some birth conditions, In NZ and Australia (and many other countries), orthodontic community initiatives have been established to help low SES adolescents access treatment. Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the attitudes of a group of New Zealand orthodontists towards the current fee-for-service model of treatment funding. Some participants reported that if the government funded orthodontic treatment, it would result in over subscription and compromised standards of care. Conclusion: Despite some low socio-economic families being unable to access orthodontic treatment because of the expense, the current fee-for-service model may be the best method for delivering high standards of orthodontic care. Conclusion: Despite some low socio-economic families being unable to access orthodontic treatment because of the expense, the current fee-for-service model may be the best method for delivering high standards of orthodontic care. (Aust Orthod J 2019; 35: 13-20)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call