Abstract
Collaborating with partners in supply-chains is generally accepted as a critical success factor. In governance value analysis (GVA), it is assumed that undertaking transaction specific investments is a key enabler of innovation and improved competitive standing in the market. However, critics contend that GVA is not a theory that deals with innovation because the unit of analysis is the transaction between firms. By means of an empirical study in the seafood industry we provide some empirical support for the critics’ view. While undertaking transaction specific investments has efficiency benefits, no effectiveness gains were found in partnerships in the food supply-chain. These results suggest that while GVA is appropriate for explaining innovation in operational collaboration with the aim of achieving cost-efficient transactions between supply-chain partners, it is less able to explain innovation in strategic, problem-solving like, collaboration.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.