The Impact of Toddler Milk Claims on Beliefs and Misperceptions: A Randomized Experiment with Parents of Young Children

Abstract

BackgroundToddler milk (ie, a nutrient-fortified milk-based drink marketed for children aged 12 to 36 months) has been marketed increasingly in the United States with structure/function claims on product packaging that are potentially misleading. ObjectiveThis study examined how structure/function claims impact parents’ beliefs and perceptions about a toddler milk product. DesignThis was a 3-arm between-subjects randomized experiment. ParticipantsA diverse sample of 2,190 US parents of children aged 1 to 5 years were chosen to take an online survey. InterventionParticipants were randomly assigned to view a toddler milk package with either an unrelated claim (“new and improved,” ie, control condition), a “brain development” claim (ie, “brain” claim), or an “immunity-related” claim (ie, “immunity” claim). Main outcome measuresOutcomes included perceptions, intentions, and beliefs about the toddler milk product. Statistical analyses performedLinear regression for continuous outcomes and logistic regression for dichotomous outcomes. ResultsParents who were exposed to the “brain” claim or the “immunity” claim were more likely to incorrectly believe that the toddler milk was as healthy or healthier than cow’s milk compared with those who saw the control claim (89% for brain claim, 87% for immunity claim, and 79% for control; P < .001 for both comparisons). Parents exposed to either the brain or immunity claim had higher intentions to give the toddler milk to their child, higher perceived product healthfulness, and stronger beliefs that pediatricians would recommend the product compared with parents exposed to the control (all, P < .001). ConclusionsThese findings suggest that structure/function claims on toddler milk packaging may mislead parents and increase the appeal of toddler milk. Our findings support calls for public health policies to regulate marketing on toddler milk packaging.