Abstract

The Trans Pacific Partnership was set to be the world's largest and most comprehensive FTA linking 12 countries on both sides of the Pacific. In a major turnaround, late January 2017, USA-one of the major trading partners to the region announced its decision to withdraw from it. Four of the ASEAN members under the TPP, namely Brunei, Malaysia, Singapore and Vietnam, have a number of existing FTAs with some major TPP members and hold a significant trade share with them. However, these countries do not have any agreements with Canada and Mexico and except Singapore, have no other trade negotiation with the USA, though the USA absorbs a significant share of the exports of the TPP-ASEAN nations, particularly of Vietnam. Given this background, withdrawal of the USA seems to be a major setback for the TPP-ASEAN countries as these economies are expected to be the largest beneficiaries of the agreement. This study investigates how far the non-participation of the USA would affect the overall growth and welfare of each of the TPP-ASEAN countries. For this purpose, the study separately evaluates the impact of the TPP on each of the TPP-ASEAN countries. As an analytical framework, the paper uses a global CGE model and attempts a number of simulations by calibrating various trade integration scenarios, such as tariff reduction and input-augmenting technological change. Results of the study show that all of the TPP-ASEAN members enjoy a welfare gain and positive growth in total output and trade when the USA is a member. Vietnam and Malaysia, in particular are the largest beneficiaries. When the USA is omitted, these countries continue to have positive growth rates but the rates fall considerably.

Highlights

  • In October 2015, the twelve Pacific Rim countries, after several years of ongoing talks, successfully concluded negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the largest, most diverse and potentially most comprehensive regional trade agreement to date (Global Economic Prospects 2016)

  • The results show that compared to the baseline scenario, TPP helps increase the intra-TPP agricultural trade by 6% and the USA accounts for largest part (33%) of agricultural export increase while Japan makes up the biggest share (70%) of agricultural import increase

  • 3.1.2 Results of scenario 3 Table 4 shows that each of the TPP-ASEAN nations would be benefitted in terms of output growth by their own tariff reduction; the growth rate is highest for Vietnam followed by Malaysia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In October 2015, the twelve Pacific Rim countries, after several years of ongoing talks, successfully concluded negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the largest, most diverse and potentially most comprehensive regional trade agreement to date (Global Economic Prospects 2016). The scope and significance of TPP extends far beyond the traditional trade issues such as trade in goods and rules of origin, and touches on many other emerging and novel trade issues (TPP Full Text, Office of the United States Trade Representative), including the Internet and the digital economy, various aspects of the law, data protection, intellectual property, participation of state-owned enterprises and competition policy. It imposes labour standards and environmental conditions on the participating countries (Schott 2013; Cimino-Isaacs and Schott 2016). The action ended US involvement in the multilateral trade deal, which had not been ratified by the Congress

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call