Abstract
The 2020–23 COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a level of government-imposed restrictions on personal freedom unknown outside of wartime. How did these restrictions affect citizens’ views about the appropriate role of government? To answer this question, we use a unique longitudinal dataset that matches the public’s views about the role of government in Australia to local variations in restrictions on personal freedom aimed at reducing community infection. We identify the extent to which local level restrictions on personal freedom, which varied widely across Australia, affected the public’s views about government intervention. The results show that there was initial support for intervention but continuing restrictions on personal freedom resulted in less support for government intervention, particularly in areas of government policy that affected relatively small population groups. The findings suggest that restrictions on personal freedom significantly changed the public’s views about the role of government in their lives.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
