Abstract
Hybrid financial instruments and entities lack any express regulation within Chilean tax law. This legal void, alongside the highly formalistic interpretation of the law applied by the Chilean tax authorities, has led to a rejection of transparent entities for Chilean tax purposes, and a classification of hybrid financial instruments as “debt” or “equity” based solely on formal arguments. New general anti-avoidance rules (2014) have introduced a substance-over-form principle, which is starting to be factually and preventively applied by the Chilean tax authorities. The following analysis aims to illustrate the above-mentioned trend, in particular as it relates to hybrid financial instruments and entities, traditionally “no man’s land” for tax purposes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Finance and Capital Markets (formerly Derivatives & Financial Instruments)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.