The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) on male sexual health

Abstract

During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there was an increase in the amount of men seeking treatment at urology outpatient clinics for sexual complaints. However, it is unknown whether this condition is directly related to COVID-19. The impact of COVID-19 on male sexual health was explored in the present study. Individuals in the male sexual health cohort of our clinic were retrospectively examined. Men who applied to our clinic in the last 6 months and had a history of COVID-19 afterward were invited for an assesment at the 3rd month post COVID-19. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), total testosterone (TT), and prolactin (PRL) levels were all measured. Furthermore, the Premature ejaculation diagnostic tool (PEDT), the Chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI), the International Index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5), the Beck depression inventory (BDI), and the Beck anxiety inventory (BAI) scores were recorded. The pre-covid and post-covid data of the subjects were compared. The mean age of the participants was 34.8±7.7, the mean body mass index was 26.82±5.3, and the mean modified Charlson comorbidity index was 0.2±0.41. COVID-19 severity was mild in 19/25 (76%) and moderate in 6/25 (24%) of the subjects. LH, FSH, TT, and PRL levels did not differ between precovid and postcovid periods (p>0.05). There was no significant change in PEDT, NIH-CPSI, IIEF-5, or BAI scale scores in the postcovid period (p>0.05), although there was an remarkable decrease in BDI scores as compared to the precovid period (p>0.05). While there was no difference in sex hormone levels or scale scores used to assess premature ejaculation, erectile dysfunction, chronic prostatitis, or anxiety, we noticed an unanticipated decrease in depression levels in individuals recovering from COVID-19. More precise results on the impact of COVID-19 on male sexual health could be revealed in future cohort studies with higher case numbers. The authors declare no conflict of interest.