Abstract

Imaging data has become an essential tool to explore key biological questions at various scales, for example the motile behaviour of bacteria or the transport of mRNA, and it has the potential to transform our understanding of important transport mechanisms. Often these imaging studies require us to compare biological species or mutants, and to do this we need to quantitatively characterise their behaviour. Mathematical models offer a quantitative description of a system that enables us to perform this comparison, but to relate mechanistic mathematical models to imaging data, we need to estimate their parameters. In this work we study how collecting data at different temporal resolutions impacts our ability to infer parameters of biological transport models by performing exact inference for simple velocity jump process models in a Bayesian framework. The question of how best to choose the frequency with which data is collected is prominent in a host of studies because the majority of imaging technologies place constraints on the frequency with which images can be taken, and the discrete nature of observations can introduce errors into parameter estimates. In this work, we mitigate such errors by formulating the velocity jump process model within a hidden states framework. This allows us to obtain estimates of the reorientation rate and noise amplitude for noisy observations of a simple velocity jump process. We demonstrate the sensitivity of these estimates to temporal variations in the sampling resolution and extent of measurement noise. We use our methodology to provide experimental guidelines for researchers aiming to characterise motile behaviour that can be described by a velocity jump process. In particular, we consider how experimental constraints resulting in a trade-off between temporal sampling resolution and observation noise may affect parameter estimates. Finally, we demonstrate the robustness of our methodology to model misspecification, and then apply our inference framework to a dataset that was generated with the aim of understanding the localization of RNA-protein complexes.

Highlights

  • Biological transport processes occur on a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, and a common mechanism for transport involves two phases: fast active transport, and a quasi-stationary reorientation phase

  • We consider how the temporal resolution of imaging studies affects our ability to carry out accurate parameter estimation for a stochastic biological transport model

  • This model provides a mechanistic description of motile behaviour and is often used to interrogate transport processes, such as the motion of bacteria

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biological transport processes occur on a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, and a common mechanism for transport involves two phases: fast active transport, and a quasi-stationary reorientation phase This pattern of movements has been observed at a range of scales from the intracellular transport of cellular components such as mRNA particles moving on a microtubule network [1], to the run-and-tumble motion of bacteria such as Escherichia coli [2,3,4], and the flights of birds between nesting sites [5]. By performing experiments to test model predictions, we can evaluate the areas in which a given model fails to describe experimental data, and so iteratively refine our understanding of a given system or phenomenon

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.