The impact of team familiarity on intra and postoperative cardiac surgical outcomes

Abstract

BackgroundFamiliarity among cardiac surgery team members may be an important contributor to better outcomes and thus serve as a target for enhancing outcomes. MethodsAdult cardiac surgical procedures (n = 4,445) involving intraoperative providers were evaluated at a tertiary hospital between 2016 and 2020. Team familiarity (mean of prior cardiac surgeries performed by participating surgeon/nonsurgeon pairs within 2 years before the operation) were regressed on cardiopulmonary bypass duration (primary—an intraoperative measure of care efficiency) and postoperative complication outcomes (major morbidity, mortality), adjusting for provider experience, surgeon 2-year case volume before the surgery, case start time, weekday, and perioperative risk factors. The relationship between team familiarity and outcomes was assessed across predicted risk strata. ResultsMedian (interquartile range) cardiopulmonary bypass duration was 132 (91–192) minutes, and 698 (15.7%) patients developed major postoperative morbidity. The relationship between team familiarity and cardiopulmonary bypass duration significantly differed across predicted risk strata (P = .0001). High (relative to low) team familiarity was associated with reduced cardiopulmonary bypass duration for medium-risk (–24 minutes) and high-risk (–27 minutes) patients. Increasing team familiarity was not significantly associated with the odds of major morbidity and mortality. ConclusionTeam familiarity, which was predictive of improved intraoperative efficiency without compromising major postoperative outcomes, may serve as a novel quality improvement target in the setting of cardiac surgery.