Abstract

This paper uses experimental methods to analyze how different forms of taxation influence the decision between immediate consumption and saving. The parameters are chosen in such a way that the treatments No Tax, Immediate Taxation and Deferred Taxation have identical net payoffs, which should induce the same decisionmaking patterns. However, we find that these expectations only apply to the treatments No Tax and Immediate Taxation. The participants in the Deferred Taxation treatment show a significantly weaker preference for saving which hints at a misperception of this form of taxation. This result also has political implications as many OECD countries try to incentivize voluntary saving for retirement through deferred taxation. In the experiment, however, this type of taxation leads to less saving than an economically equivalent immediate taxation of savings. Furthermore, the paper shows that individuals only partially recognize the advantages of immediate or deferred taxation compared to a classic income tax. While the periodic yield is tax exempt in systems of immediate or deferred taxation, it is taxable under a classical income tax. The latter should have a negative effect on saving decisions. However, these theoretical predictions do not hold in our experiment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.