Abstract

The present study is an attempt to investigate the conjoint off impact of Social Economic Status towards the prediction of Emotional intelligence and Creativity among tribal students. Accordingly,100 tribal samples, 50boys and 50girls of VIII, IX & X class from Vivekananda Tribal Centre for learning(VTCL), Hosahalli, H.D.Kote, Mysore. The Socio Economic Status scale by Meenakshi(2004), Emotional Intelligence by Upinder Dhar(2010), and creativity test by Wallach-kogan. The results revealed that High Socio Economic Status students have more Emotional Intelligence and creative than the Low Socio Economic Status Students. Girls and boys have same level of Emotional Intelligence and Creativity. In Emotional Intelligence is no differences in three community students but in creativity Yerava Students have more creative than the other two community students.

Highlights

  • The present study is an attempt to investigate the conjoint off impact of Social Economic Status towards the prediction of Emotional intelligence and Creativity among tribal students

  • The above table shows that, the Mean & SD of Emotional Intelligence & Creativity in High Socio Economic Status & Low Socio Economic Status the Mean and SD of Emotional Intelligence in High Socio Economic Status is 48.84 and 7.31, and Mean Score of Low Socio Economic Status is 44.90 & 7.92 respectively. It shows that who have High Socio Economic Status they are good in their Emotional Intelligence

  • Who have high socio economic status they are good in emotional intelligence because of their family factor, environmental factors is good & their parents are economically high and they got all facilities from media and other channels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The present study is an attempt to investigate the conjoint off impact of Social Economic Status towards the prediction of Emotional intelligence and Creativity among tribal students. Girls and boys have same level of Emotional Intelligence and Creativity. The Latin term, “tribes” has since been transformed to mean, “A group of persons forming a community and claiming descent from a common ancestor”. Can be deemed to be a member of a tribe Those peoples who resisted joining in larger nation state entities were soon labeled by the nation states themselves to be “tribes.” These people were “known to the world at large by names that have no relation to their own self-appellations. Tribal communities constitute about seven percent of the total population of India. These communities have variety and complexity in the belief systems as well as religious practices. Even these religions have historical antecedents which are documented in their oral epics and songs

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.