Abstract
BackgroundVulnerable populations have worse hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) outcomes. We sought to understand if this could be mitigated at a safety-net hospital. MethodsA retrospective chart review of HCC patients was conducted (2007–2018). Stage at presentation, intervention and systemic therapy were analyzed (Chi-square for categorical variables and Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables) and median survival calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results388 HCC patients were identified. Sociodemographic factors were similar for stage at presentation, except insurance status (diagnosis at earlier stages for commercial insurance and later stages for safety-net/no insurance). Higher education level and origin of mainland US increased intervention rates for all stages. Early-stage disease patients had no differences in receipt of intervention or therapy. Late-stage disease patients with higher education level had increased intervention rates. Median survival was not impacted by any sociodemographic factor. ConclusionUrban safety-net hospitals with a focus on vulnerable patient populations provide equitable outcomes and can serve as a model to address inequities in HCC management.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.