Abstract

BackgroundHealth workers routinely carry out clinical behaviours, such as prescribing, test-ordering or hand-washing, which impact on patient diagnoses, care, treatment and recovery. Social norms are the implicit or explicit rules that a group uses to determine values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviours. A social norms intervention seeks to change the clinical behaviour of a target health worker by exposing them to the values, beliefs, attitudes or behaviours of a reference group or person. This study aims to find out whether or not social norms interventions are effective ways of encouraging health workers to carry out desired behaviours and to identify which types of social norms intervention, if any, are most effective.MethodsA systematic review will be conducted. The inclusion criteria are a population of health professionals, a social norms intervention that seeks to change a clinical behaviour, and randomised controlled trials. Searches will be undertaken in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, British Nursing Index, ISI Web of Science, PsycINFO and Cochrane trials. Titles and abstracts will be reviewed against the inclusion criteria to exclude any that are clearly ineligible. Two reviewers will independently screen all the remaining full texts to identify relevant papers. For studies which meet our inclusion criteria, two reviewers will extract data independently, code for behaviour change techniques and assess quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome measure will be compliance with desired behaviour. To assess the effect of social norms on the behaviour of health workers, we will perform fixed effects meta-analysis and present forest plots, stratified by behaviour change technique. We will explore sources of variation using meta-regression and may use multi-component-based network meta-analysis to explore which forms of social norms are more likely to be effective, if our data meet the necessary requirements.DiscussionThe study will provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of different methods of applying social norms to change the clinical behaviour of health professionals. We will disseminate the research to academics, health workers and members of the public and use the findings from the review to plan future research on the use of social norms with health workers.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42016045718. Future protocol changes will be clearly stated in PROSPERO.

Highlights

  • Health workers routinely carry out clinical behaviours, such as prescribing, test-ordering or handwashing, which impact on patient diagnoses, care, treatment and recovery

  • Interventions The systematic review will focus on social norms interventions, defined as interventions seeking to change the clinical behaviour of a target health worker by exposing them to the values, beliefs, attitudes or behaviours of a reference group or person

  • The justification for restricting the review to Randomised controlled trial (RCT) is that the review is concerned with the effectiveness of social norms, and randomised controlled trials are the best method for assessing the effectiveness of an intervention

Read more

Summary

Methods

This protocol follows the PRISMA-P reporting guidelines for systematic reviews [20] (PRISMA-P checklist included as Additional file 1). Eligibility criteria The inclusion criteria for the review are a population of health professionals, a social norms intervention that seeks to change a clinical behaviour, and the study type is a randomised controlled trial. Interventions The systematic review will focus on social norms interventions, defined as interventions seeking to change the clinical behaviour of a target health worker by exposing them to the values, beliefs, attitudes or behaviours of a reference group or person. The justification for restricting the review to RCTs is that the review is concerned with the effectiveness of social norms, and randomised controlled trials are the best method for assessing the effectiveness of an intervention We will include both published and unpublished research. Example: Show the doctor the proportion of patients who were prescribed antibiotics for a common cold by other doctors and compare with their own data

Discussion
Background
Social Comparison—unchanged
Information about others’ approval—unchanged
10.4. Social reward
Social norm intervention A vs Social norm intervention B
10.5 Social reward
Context
Mode of delivery
Social norm behaviour change technique
Findings
Availability of data and materials Not applicable
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call