Abstract

BackgroundCardiac diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is limited by scan time and signal-to-noise (SNR) restrictions. This invariably leads to a trade-off between the number of averages, diffusion-weighted directions (ND), and image resolution. Systematic evaluation of these parameters is therefore important for adoption of cardiac DTI in clinical routine where time is a key constraint.MethodsHigh quality reference DTI data were acquired in five ex-vivo rat hearts. We then retrospectively set 2 ≤ SNR ≤ 97, 7 ≤ ND ≤ 61, varied the voxel volume by up to 192-fold and investigated the impact on the accuracy and precision of commonly derived parameters.ResultsFor maximal scan efficiency, the accuracy and precision of the mean diffusivity is optimised when SNR is maximised at the expense of ND. With typical parameter settings used clinically, we estimate that fractional anisotropy may be overestimated by up to 13% with an uncertainty of ±30%, while the precision of the sheetlet angles may be as poor as ±31°. Although the helix angle has better precision of ±14°, the transmural range of helix angles may be under-estimated by up to 30° in apical and basal slices, due to partial volume and tapering myocardial geometry.ConclusionsThese findings inform a baseline of understanding upon which further issues inherent to in-vivo cardiac DTI, such as motion, strain and perfusion, can be considered. Furthermore, the reported bias and reproducibility provides a context in which to assess cardiac DTI biomarkers.

Highlights

  • Cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is limited by scan time and signal-to-noise (SNR) restrictions

  • Experiment 1: Effects of image resolution Using the 3D–DS scheme, the median λ1 was 0.87% lower, λ2 was 0.87% lower, and λ3 was 0.16% lower than in the high resolution data, resulting in 0.69% lower mean diffusivity (MD) and 2.35% lower fractional anisotropy (FA)

  • We show here that low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) leads to bias in DTI parameters, and the effects of partial volume obscuring finer structures in the down-sampled data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is limited by scan time and signal-to-noise (SNR) restrictions. This invariably leads to a trade-off between the number of averages, diffusion-weighted directions (ND), and image resolution. Systematic evaluation of these parameters is important for adoption of cardiac DTI in clinical routine where time is a key constraint. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) allows for probing tissue microstructure. In the heart, it is increasingly being used as a non-invasive method of characterising healthy, as well as diseased hearts, such as those with hypertrophy or myocardial infarction [1, 2]. Reliable sorting of v2 and v3 in the presence of noise, and reliable estimation of sheetlet angles, remains a challenge [5]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call