The Impact of Senior Author Profile on Publication Level of Evidence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Abstract

Background:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS) incorporated the level of evidence (LOE) pyramid in 2011 to highlight evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery. This study aimed to assess the relationship between the profile of senior authors publishing in PRS and the LOE of publications.Methods:All accepted publications by American senior authors to PRS between January 2018 and March 2020 were classified by LOE. Demographic, educational, and career data on all senior authors were collected using publicly available online resources.Results:A total of 1030 articles were screened‚ of which 266 (25.8%) were eligible for LOE classification with the following distribution: I, 0.8%; II, 14.3%; III, 45.1%; IV, 33.1%; and V, 7.1%. Senior author demographic factors, including gender and race/ethnicity, did not significantly impact LOE (P > 0.05 for all). An advanced degree was associated with more publications per year, and only a PhD (P = 0.022) and board certification (P = 0.012) were associated with a higher LOE of publications (P = 0.022). Physicians working in an academic setting were significantly more likely to publish level III evidence than their private/community-based counterparts (P = 0.006). Breast papers constituted the highest proportion of level III evidence (41.4%; P < 0.001).Conclusions:Most publications in PRS contain level III-IV evidence. Senior author gender, race, and ethnicity did not impact LOE of publications. Plastic surgery board certification, possession of a PhD, and academic practice setting were associated with higher LOE of publications.