Abstract

The impact of selection bias on the results of clinical trials has been analyzed extensively for trials of two treatments, yet its impact in multi-arm trials is still unknown. In this paper, we investigate selection bias in multi-arm trials by its impact on the type I error probability. We propose two models for selection bias, so-called biasing policies, that both extend the classic guessing strategy by Blackwell and Hodges. We derive the distribution of the F-test statistic under the misspecified outcome model and provide a formula for the type I error probability under selection bias. We apply the presented approach to quantify the influence of selection bias in multi-arm trials with increasing number of treatment groups using a permuted block design for different assumptions and different biasing strategies. Our results confirm previous findings that smaller block sizes lead to a higher proportion of sequences with inflated type I error probability. Astonishingly, our results also show that the proportion of sequences with inflated type I error probability remains constant when the number of treatment groups is increased. Realizing that the impact of selection bias cannot be completely eliminated, we propose a bias adjusted statistical model and show that the power of the statistical test is only slightly deflated for larger block sizes.

Highlights

  • Multi-arm clinical trials have been gaining more and more importance, due to the recent advances in small population group research [1]

  • We have shown that more than two treatment arms do not protect the test decision in a clinical trial from the influence of selection bias

  • We derived a formula for calculation of the impact of selection bias on the overall F—test, which can be applied to all non-adaptive, unstratified randomization procedures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Multi-arm clinical trials have been gaining more and more importance, due to the recent advances in small population group research [1]. In the section entitled “Model”, we present our assumptions for the outcome model and introduce the permuted block design, the randomization procedure most frequently used for assigning patients to multiple treatment groups.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call