The Impact of Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty on Resident Training

Abstract

BackgroundAs robotic-assisted total knee replacement (rTKA) continues to gain popularity, the impact of this technology on resident education remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to describe trainee experience and perceptions of rTKA and its effect on surgical training. MethodsTwo hundred and twenty two senior orthopaedic residents attending a national board review course completed a 17-question survey regarding their experience and perceptions regarding rTKA. Mean and standard deviations were calculated for Likert scale questions, and bivariate analyses were utilized to compare answer groups. ResultsSeventy percent of respondents reported exposure to rTKA during their training. Of those with robotic exposure, 20% reported that greater than half of their TKA experience involved robotics. Only 29% percent agreed that robotics improved outcomes, whereas 21% disagreed and the remainder were unsure. Over half of respondents agreed that robotics are used primarily for marketing purposes. Of those who trained with rTKA, 45% percent believed that robotics improved their understanding of the surgical procedure; however, 25% felt robotics negatively compromised their training with traditional instrumentation. Higher robotic case exposure (P = .001) and attending an industry-sponsored course (P = .02) was associated with the belief that robotics improved outcomes. Robotic case volume and percentage was associated with the belief that robotics improved understanding of the surgical procedure, however, it also was associated with reduced comfort performing traditional knee arthroplasty (P = .001). ConclusionCurrent resident training experience varies greatly within the United States with regards to rTKA. While exposure to rTKA may be beneficial for a well-rounded surgical education, over-exposure likely results in decreased comfort with traditional instrumentation.