Abstract

Several studies have indicated that interacting with social robots in educational contexts may lead to greater learning than interactions with computers or virtual agents. As such, an increasing amount of social human-robot interaction research is being conducted in the learning domain, particularly with children. However, it is unclear precisely what social behaviour a robot should employ in such interactions. Inspiration can be taken from human-human studies; this often leads to an assumption that the more social behaviour an agent utilises, the better the learning outcome will be. We apply a nonverbal behaviour metric to a series of studies in which children are taught how to identify prime numbers by a robot with various behavioural manipulations. We find a trend which generally agrees with the pedagogy literature, but also that overt nonverbal behaviour does not account for all learning differences. We discuss the impact of novelty, child expectations, and responses to social cues to further the understanding of the relationship between robot social behaviour and learning. We suggest that the combination of nonverbal behaviour and social cue congruency is necessary to facilitate learning.

Highlights

  • The efficacy of robots in educational contexts has been demonstrated by several researchers when compared to not having a robot at all and when compared to other types of media, such as virtual characters (Han et al, 2005; Leyzberg et al, 2012; Tanaka and Matsuzoe, 2012; Alemi et al, 2014)

  • Post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction reveal that the adult-judged Nonverbal immediacy (NVI) of the Low NVI robot (LNVI) condition is significantly different to all other conditions (p < 0.001 in all cases), but no other pairwise comparisons are statistically significant at p < 0.05

  • A strong positive correlation is found between the NVI score of the conditions and the learning effect sizes (Cohen’s d) of children who interacted in those conditions (r(3) = 0.70, p = 0.188)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The efficacy of robots in educational contexts has been demonstrated by several researchers when compared to not having a robot at all and when compared to other types of media, such as virtual characters (Han et al, 2005; Leyzberg et al, 2012; Tanaka and Matsuzoe, 2012; Alemi et al, 2014). If the social behavior of an agent can be improved, the social presence will increase and interaction outcomes should improve further (for example, through social facilitation effects (Zajonc, 1965)), but it is unclear how robot social behavior should be implemented to achieve such aims This has resulted in researchers exploring various aspects of robot social behavior and attempting to measure the outcomes of interactions in educational contexts, but a complex picture is emerging. The importance of social behavior in teaching and learning has been demonstrated between humans (Goldin-Meadow et al, 1992, 2001), but not enough is known for implementation in human–robot interaction (HRI) scenarios This has led researchers to start exploring precisely how a robot should behave socially when information needs to be communicated

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call