Abstract

Listening to speech in an environment with reverberation can be challenging for both the normal and impaired auditory system. However, it has been shown for both normal- and impaired-hearing listeners that it is the late reflections that are responsible for degrading intelligibility, whereas early reflections actually aid intelligibility by increasing the effective signal-to-noise ratio. Contrastingly, studies conducted with cochlear implant (CI) recipients have suggested that CI recipients have almost no tolerance for reverberation and that they are negatively impacted by both early and late reflections. The main objective of the current study is to re-evaluate the influence of reverberation on speech intelligibility in CI recipients using more authentic virtual auditory environments. Unlike previous studies in this area, this study was conducted using a loudspeaker-based auralization system rather than non-individualized binaural room simulations. Speech intelligibility was measured in simulations of a range of actual physical rooms with plausible source-receiver distances, both with and without late reflections. The results show that the effect of reverberation is much smaller than previously suggested, especially with short source-receiver distances. Furthermore, the results suggest that, in contrast to previous literature, early reflections may not actually be detrimental to CI recipients.

Highlights

  • One of the most challenging situations for understanding speech is in reverberant, multi-talker environments

  • The boxplots depict the distribution across participants, whereas individual participant responses are indicated by the transparent, gray lines

  • The current study investigated the relative effects of reverberation and source–receiver distance on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant (CI) listeners in a range of plausible listening scenarios

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the most challenging situations for understanding speech is in reverberant, multi-talker environments. Kokkinakis et al (2011) extended this study by testing a range of reverberation times from RT 1⁄4 0 s and RT 1⁄4 1.0 s and found that the mean word recognition scores dropped from 90% in the anechoic condition to 20% in reverberation with RT 1⁄4 1.0 s. Kokkinakis and Loizou (2011) reported a decrease in mean word recognition scores from 84% correct in an anechoic condition to only 20% in reverberation with a reverberation time of RT 1⁄4 1.0 s at a source–receiver distance of 1 m. Hersbach et al (2015) investigated the effect of the source–receiver distance, in addition to the reverberation time of

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call