Abstract

Recent empirical evidence has suggested that the flashes associated with red light running cameras (RLRCs) distract younger drivers, pulling attention away from the roadway and delaying processing of safety-relevant events. Considering the perceptual and attentional declines that occur with age, older drivers may be especially susceptible to the distracting effects of RLRC flashes, particularly in situations in which the flash is more salient (a bright flash at night compared with the day). The current study examined how age and situational factors potentially influence attention capture by RLRC flashes using covert (cuing effects) and overt (eye movement) indices of capture. We manipulated the salience of the flash by varying its luminance and contrast with respect to the background of the driving scene (either day or night scenes). Results of 2 experiments suggest that simulated RLRC flashes capture observers' attention, but, surprisingly, no age differences in capture were observed. However, an analysis examining early and late eye movements revealed that older adults may have been strategically delaying their eye movements in order to avoid capture. Additionally, older adults took longer to disengage attention following capture, suggesting at least 1 age-related disadvantage in capture situations. Findings have theoretical implications for understanding age differences in attention capture, especially with respect to capture in real-world scenes, and inform future work that should examine how the distracting effects of RLRC flashes influence driver behavior.

Highlights

  • Driver distraction is currently a topic of great interest to researchers, lawmakers, and the general public

  • In order to examine whether the simulated Red Light Running Cameras (RLRCs) flash captured attention, cuing effect scores were calculated as the difference in RT on trials in which the RLRC flash occurred on the same side as the target brake lamp event compared to trials in which the RLRC flash occurred on the opposite side of the target brake event

  • While we expected older age groups to be more susceptible to the distracting effects of RLRC flashes, in instances in which the flash was more physically salient, we did not find any evidence that the flash differentially captured middle-age or older adults' attention

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Driver distraction is currently a topic of great interest to researchers, lawmakers, and the general public. The flash that accompanies Red Light Running Cameras (RLRCs) is one common potential source of distraction, with as many as 459 communities in 24 states using these traffic cameras (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 2015) While these traffic cameras are designed to photograph a driver's license plate and discourage red-light running, the RLRC flashes have anecdotally been reported as pulling attention away from the driving task (Townsend, 2011; WUSA-9, 2014). These reports are further supported by a large number of studies of visual attention demonstrating that a transient luminance change is one of the most reliable means to capture attention and the eyes. These impairments might include the creation of distracting afterimages and the loss of dark adaptation

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call