Abstract
Abstract Literature suggests that public reporting of quality may exacerbate disparities in access to high-quality post-acute and long-term care for older adults. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the home health (HH) 5-star ratings on changes in high-quality HH agency (HHA) use, by race, ethnicity, income level, and place-based factors. Using a difference-in-differences framework, we found that after introduction of 5-star ratings adjusted rates of high-quality HHA use increased for all HH users, except for Latinx, Asian American/Pacific Islander, and low-income HH users, and disparities in access to high-quality HHAs were exacerbated for each of these groups. Last, we found that users within predominantly Latinx and lower income neighborhoods had a significantly greater decrease in their use of high-quality HHAs. Policymakers should be aware of the potential unintended consequences of public reporting and should consider adding measures of equity to the publicly reported information.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have