Abstract
Protected areas (PAs) are a prominent approach to maintaining and enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem services. A critical question for safeguarding these resources is how PA governance processes and management structures influence their effectiveness. We conduct an impact evaluation of 12 PAs in three Central American countries to assess how processes in management restrictions, management capacity, and decentralization affect the annual change in the satellite-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). NDVI varies with greenness that relates to plant production, biomass, and important ecosystem functions related to biodiversity and ecosystem services such as water quality and carbon storage. Any loss of vegetation cover in the form of deforestation or degradation would show up as a decrease in NDVI values over time and gains in vegetation cover and regeneration as an increase in NDVI values. Management restriction categories are based on international classifications of strict versus multiple-use PAs, and capacity and decentralization categories are based on key informant interviews of PA managers. We use matching to create a counterfactual of non-protected observations and a matching estimator and regression to estimate treatment effects of each sub-sample. On average, strict and multiple-use PAs have a significant and positive effect on NDVI compared to non-protected land uses. Both high and low decentralized PAs also positively affect NDVI. High capacity PAs have a positive and significant effect on NDVI, while low capacity PAs have a negative effect on NDVI. Our findings advance knowledge on how governance and management influence PA effectiveness and suggest that capacity may be more important than governance type or management restrictions in maintaining and enhancing NDVI. This paper also provides a guide for future studies to incorporate measures of PA governance and management into impact evaluations.
Highlights
Protected areas (PAs) are critical to global conservation goals
Mean Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is most similar for non-protected pixels and low capacity PAs but across all sub-groups of PAs greenness increased over time (Table 3 and S1 Fig)
Average NDVI is higher for PAs classified as high versus low decentralization, and PAs ranked as high decentralization have higher elevations and are farther from roads
Summary
Protected areas (PAs) are critical to global conservation goals. They are created to protect and enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services. Many PAs contain important features of geological and ecological processes, as well as cultural values [1]. About 15.5% of the earth’s terrestrial surface and 3.4% of the global ocean area have been set aside and designated as PA under some type of management category—and there are international commitments to expand this area to 17% of terrestrial and 10% of marine areas under Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 [2]. Despite global commitments to establish more PAs, poor management, lack of funding, unenforced legislation, and outside threats, hinder their effectiveness [3, 4]. Deforestation and biodiversity loss continue at disturbingly high rates within many PAs [5, 6]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
