Abstract
Process improvement is critical to commercial success in VLSI fabrication, especially during ramp-up. This paper investigates one of the factors-process noise-that drives the success of process improvement. Split-lot controlled experiments are vulnerable to confounding by experimental noise, caused by process variability. Fabs with low noise levels have a higher potential for learning (and hence improving their production processes) than high noise fabs. Detailed probe yield data from five semiconductor fabs were examined to estimate process noise levels. A bootstrap simulation was used to estimate the error rates of identical controlled experiments conducted in each fab. Absolute noise levels were high for all but the best fabs, leading to lost learning. The magnitude of lost learning is estimated numerically; it ranges from ten percent to above one hundred percent of the theoretically possible learning in an experiment. In some cases, experiments are little better than coin flipping. Standard statistical methods are either expensive or ineffective for dealing with these high noise levels. Some alternative nonstatistical countermeasures are recommended.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.