Abstract
In the mobile Internet era, the widespread use of portable devices seamlessly connects consumer decision-making scenarios, potentially leading to the spillover of the impact of privacy violations into subsequent consumption decisions. Results from five experiments demonstrate that those consumers who experience a privacy violation (vs. a non-privacy violation) exhibit a lower purchase intention and preference for anthropomorphized (vs. non-anthropomorphized) products due to the symbolic meaning of “social others” embedded within the product and messages. Perceptual boundary invasion and social avoidance tendency are sequential mediators in this process. Yet, the negative effect diminishes when a product is anthropomorphized as a family member (vs. anthropomorphized with a general social role). The findings provide valuable managerial insight into comprehending and mitigating the spillover effects of privacy violations in anthropomorphized product design and online encounters.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
