Abstract

Association between physical performance and movement quality remains ambiguous. However, both affect injury risk. Furthermore, existing research rarely regards women. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the impact of physical performance components on FMS scores and asymmetries among young women—University Physical Education Students. The study sample was 101 women, 21.72 ± 1.57 years, body mass index 21.52 ± 2.49 [kg/m2]. The FMS test was conducted to assess the movement patterns quality. Physical performance tests were done to evaluate strength, power, flexibility. Flexibility has the strongest correlation with FMS overall (r = 0.25, p = 0.0130) and single tasks scores. A higher level of flexibility and strength of abdominal muscles are associated with fewer asymmetries (r = −0.31, p = 0.0018; r = −0.27, p = 0.0057, respectively). However, the main findings determine that flexibility has the strongest and statistically significant impact on FMS overall (ß = 0.25, p = 0.0106) and asymmetries (ß = −0.30, p = 0.0014). Additionally, a significant effect of abdominal muscles strength on FMS asymmetries were observed (ß = −0.29, p = 0.0027). Flexibility and abdominal muscles strength have the most decisive impact on movement patterns quality. These results suggest possibilities for shaping FMS scores in young women.

Highlights

  • The physical performance and movement patterns quality affect injury risk [1,2].Physical performance is defined as a body function that an appropriate test can objectively measure

  • Our analysis showed that the number of asymmetries observed during the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) test is related to flexibility and abdominal muscle strength, indicating these factors’

  • Healthy women, flexibility and abdominal muscles strength are significantly associated with the quality of movement patterns, expressed as an FMS overall score and FMS asymmetries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The physical performance and movement patterns quality affect injury risk [1,2]. Physical performance is defined as a body function that an appropriate test can objectively measure. It is a multidimensional concept which involves musculoskeletal system function, cardiorespiratory and nervous system. Physical performance is expressed by a level of single components such as strength, flexibility, speed, or endurance. Movement patterns quality is mainly examined by the FMS test, which detects dysfunctional movement patterns [5]. The relationships between the quality of movement patterns and physical performance components have been investigated. These associations have not been clearly defined. It is needed to establish these associations among women

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.