Abstract
Abstract. Snow photochemical processes drive production of chemical trace gases in snowpacks, including nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO + NO2) and hydrogen oxide radical (HOx = OH + HO2), which are then released to the lower atmosphere. Coupled atmosphere–snow modelling of theses processes on global scales requires simple parameterisations of actinic flux in snow to reduce computational cost. The disagreement between a physical radiative-transfer (RT) method and a parameterisation based upon the e-folding depth of actinic flux in snow is evaluated. In particular, the photolysis of the nitrate anion (NO3-), the nitrite anion (NO2-) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in snow and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in the snowpack interstitial air are considered. The emission flux from the snowpack is estimated as the product of the depth-integrated photolysis rate coefficient, v, and the concentration of photolysis precursors in the snow. The depth-integrated photolysis rate coefficient is calculated (a) explicitly with an RT model (TUV), vTUV, and (b) with a simple parameterisation based on e-folding depth, vze. The metric for the evaluation is based upon the deviation of the ratio of the depth-integrated photolysis rate coefficient determined by the two methods, vTUV/vze, from unity. The ratio depends primarily on the position of the peak in the photolysis action spectrum of chemical species, solar zenith angle and physical properties of the snowpack, i.e. strong dependence on the light-scattering cross section and the mass ratio of light-absorbing impurity (i.e. black carbon and HULIS) with a weak dependence on density. For the photolysis of NO2, the NO2- anion, the NO3- anion and H2O2 the ratio vTUV/vze varies within the range of 0.82–1.35, 0.88–1.28, 0.93–1.27 and 0.91–1.28 respectively. The e-folding depth parameterisation underestimates for small solar zenith angles and overestimates at solar zenith angles around 60° compared to the RT method. A simple algorithm has been developed to improve the parameterisation which reduces the ratio vTUV/vze to 0.97–1.02, 0.99–1.02, 0.99–1.03 and 0.98–1.06 for photolysis of NO2, the NO2- anion, the NO3- anion and H2O2 respectively. The e-folding depth parameterisation may give acceptable results for the photolysis of the NO3- anion and H2O2 in cold polar snow with large solar zenith angles, but it can be improved by a correction based on solar zenith angle and for cloudy skies.
Highlights
Field and laboratory experiments over the past 2 decades have provided evidence that photochemical reactions occurring within snow lead to the emission of various gaseous compounds from the snowpack (e.g. Jacobi et al, 2004; Jones et al, 2000; Beine et al, 2002, 2006; Dibb et al, 2002; Simpson et al, 2002) and production of radicals, e.g. hydroxyl radical (OH), within the snowpack (e.g. Mauldin et al, 2001; Chen et al, 2004; Sjostedt et al, 2005; France et al, 2011)
The parameterisation of snowpack actinic flux based on the e-folding depth – the ze method, which approximates the actinic flux profile by an exponential function – may lead to under/overestimation of depth-integrated photolysis rate coefficients compared to the RT method
The deviation depends on the chemical species, solar zenith angle and properties of the snowpack
Summary
Field and laboratory experiments over the past 2 decades have provided evidence that photochemical reactions occurring within snow lead to the emission of various gaseous compounds from the snowpack (e.g. Jacobi et al, 2004; Jones et al, 2000; Beine et al, 2002, 2006; Dibb et al, 2002; Simpson et al, 2002) and production of radicals, e.g. hydroxyl radical (OH), within the snowpack (e.g. Mauldin et al, 2001; Chen et al, 2004; Sjostedt et al, 2005; France et al, 2011). The porous structure of snowpacks allows the exchange of gases and particles with the atmosphere. The exchange between snowpack and overlying atmosphere depends on dry and wet deposition, transport (including wind pumping and diffusion) and snow microphysics (e.g. BartelsRausch et al, 2014). Snow can act as both a source and a sink of atmospheric chemical species as summarised in Bartels-Rausch et al (2014) and Grannas et al (2007). Photochemistry in the snowpack needs to be fully understood because (1) emitted photolysis products play an impor-. Chan et al.: Radiation decay in snowpack tant role in determining the oxidising capacity of the lower atmosphere – e.g. concentration of O3, HOx, H2O2 – and (2) chemical preserved in ice cores, and potential palaeoclimate proxies, may be altered by reactions with OH radicals, photolysis or physical uptake and release (Wolff and Bales, 1996)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
